About Me

Name: MrWebsmith
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Oh, Look Here, The Employees Are Involved In A Mutiny

Exhibit #1 David Scott (D-GA 13th district)
 
One of eighteen states that allows recall elections, Georgia voters in the 13th district should consider removing this pompous blowhard from office now. Why wait until November of 2010? State statutes explain what is allowed as reasons for having a recall election. Two of the items mentioned are "violation of oath of office; failure to perform duties prescribed by law"
(Ga. Code §21-4-3(7) and 21-4-4(c)). See Recalling Elected Officials.
 
A performance review of your discharge of duties as an elected official is in order. The oath of office:
 
“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Oath of Office
 
Now, explain to me, Rep. Scott, how is attempting to force health care legislation upon your constituents discharging your duty to be their representative? How is repeating talking points from Obama, Hoyer, Pelosi, not engaging in purposeful evasion? And, while were on the subject, how about being familiar enough with your own little slice of Georgia to realize when you are calling someone who lives in your district all manner of insults?
 
Webster's dictionary defines evasion as "an avoiding of duty,question,etc. by deceit or cleverness." Hmmm, does not having townhall meetings,not answering questions from concerned citizens, having only a telephone style town hall, among other antics, sound like evasion to you? 
 
I'm not an attorney or an attorney spokesperson but I learned about our government in civics and American History classes as a child here in flyover country. I've made numerous trips to the library and have read our nation's founding documents. Congressman Scott, what part about the word "representative" do you not understand? You do not tell your constituents what they should do, what they should be in favor of or what they may talk about during a town hall meeting. You, sir, are the employee! Those bothersome people asking questions about legislation? Citizens. Citizens who pay your salary, who trusted you with elected office, and they have every right to tell you how you should vote for them on issues and laws. They elected you.
 
They also have the authority to throw you out of office for violating their trust and for breaking your solemn oath to represent them and to defend them from all enemies, foreign and domestic. So what will it be, sir? Shall the good people of your district recall you now,  in 2009, or should they send your sorry self home in 2010?
 
Finally, this same admonition is for every other representative who thinks they are entitled to anything. All 435 of you have a duty that you swore an oath to fulfill - and it is to the citizens who elected you, not to any President, not to the Speaker of the House, not to anyone else! WE THE PEOPLE are the owners of this ship and any mutiny attempted by you scallywags will be dealt with by a ballot box revolution the likes of which this nation has never witnessed.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A History Of Wrecking Things

Most everyone has heard or read about the tragic wreck that happened on the Washington, D.C., area Metro Transit Red Line earlier this week. Let me say straight up that I'm not trying to make light of this event but it does provide a vivid example of how government runs things.

National Transportation Safety Board officials said the system failed to heed a 2006 warning to upgrade or eliminate its oldest train cars, including the lead car of the train that slammed into another train Monday, killing nine people. Despite NTSB concerns that the 30-year-old cars couldn't withstand a crash, the officials said the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority didn't act. --from the Wall Street Journal article here

Public transportation, light rail in particular, is being promoted by some groups and politicians as an answer to traffic headaches in many metropolitan areas. However, reality met with the law of unintended consequences earlier this week. The dangers lurking in these outdated, overused cars in use by the DC Metro Transit were well known by the authorities. So why wasn't action taken to help prevent a disaster like the one on Monday? A glaring, disturbing pattern, year after year, is a primary culprit. The pattern of insufficient funding for the upkeep of the Metro Transit cars. In other words, caring for the rail system was RATIONED because public funding was routinely cut. We are told it will cost, for example, 300 million dollars to build a light rail system but extreme environmentalists and politicians often forget about those pesky little things called maintenance, operating expenses, and depreciation. Why should they care? Unlike in the business world, Congress will just raise taxes or ask the Federal Reserve to print more money if it turns out to be an ill-conceived plan. The Light Rail Myth 
 

One could also consider the congressional oversight of the mortgage and financial markets another train wreck that resulted in the market meltdown of the past couple of years. The federal government demanded that banks and lending institutions make bad loans even though many had warned again and again that a financial markets and housing crash would ensue. A Completely Preventable Crisis

I suggest that the Metro Transit tragedy is also a preview of what ObamaCare would be like. As the population continues to increase, and the incentives for innovation are obliterated by a national or socialized health care system, funding will be a perpetual concern for politicians. Which line will get the needed maintenance? Why spend needed money on repairing older models (senior citizens) or defective cars (people)? Rationing of care will become urgent as ObamaCare slides into an unsustainable bottomless pit of despair. Kiss Your Access Goodbye

Unfortunately, Monday's tragedy was not the first nor will it be the last disaster coming down the line from Washington, D.C. How many more train wrecks, literally and figuratively, must we endure before realizing that public funding of industry will always, uh, jump the tracks?
 
**Originally posted on my companion blog MrWebsmith's Reports
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Freedom Lovers Shouldn't Let Politicians Drive Drunk

Several weeks ago I made several "tweets" on Twitter about the results of some U.S. elections. One thing I find quite striking is how similar the House and Senate majorities elected in 2008 are to those elected in 1992.

Reviewing this brief list also confirms the view of many that big government harms our nation rather than helping it. For instance, consider the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, who also had a Democrat governing majority. During his watch the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Reserve Bank were created. And now, the "tweets" of the story: 

>>2008 current House count is 255 Democrats (very similar to 1992 results as some have noted)-Pelosi/Reid will go too far to left and >>2010? about 1 hour ago from web  
  
>>2006 elections result in return of House to Dem control, after a couple years of
Republicans acting like big spending liberals-Reps lost >>way about 1 hour ago from web 

>>1994 elections result in repudiation of big government policies,give Republicans control of House and Senate for first time in 40 years! >>about 1 hour ago from web  
  
>>1992 elections gave Clinton a 258 seat majority in House of Reps and control of
Senate-HillaryHealthcare,Interstate Banking >>Act,stronger CRA about 1 hour ago from web

>>Imagine, people get to keep 72% of income at the highest level rather than 30% - talk about new capital available for economic >>growth! about 1 hour ago from web  
  
>>Why is he known as Ronaldus Magnus? Reagan accomplished what he did even though he
never had a majority of House of Reps. >>Freedom works! about 1 hour ago from web  
  
>>Carter's bumbling also allowed fall of Shah which resulted in Muslim radical control
of Iran,American hostage crisis,high interest,inflation >>about 1 hour ago from web  
  
>>1976 election results gave Carter a 292 seat majority in House of Reps-created Depts
of Education,Energy and C.R.A.,gave away >>Panama Canal about 2 hours ago from web  
  
>>Result of 1964 elections gave Dems 295 seats in House of Reps. Can anyone say War on
Poverty, Medicare/Medicaid,Vietnam War >>escalation? about 2 hours ago from web  
  
>>As result of 1936 elections there were only 88 Republicans in House of Reps! The next
election Republicans gained 81 seats-FDR >>went too far about 2 hours ago from web


There is not space enough to list the behemoths given life by FDR and his long majority in both houses of Congress. Suffice it to say that the depression only became The Great Depression after years of big government programs enacted by those in Washington, D.C. who could not effectively run the government but somehow thought they knew how to run the businesses across the land. 

And what of LBJ and the hapless peanut farmer from Georgia? War On Poverty, Medicare, Departments of Energy and Education.

The Clintons' co-presidency is almost entirely responsible for the mortgage meltdown we now find ourselves in. Attorney General Janet Reno threatened banks with lawsuits if they did not make loans to people who could not possibly repay them. The Interstate Banking Act of 1994, passed while Clinton still had a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress, cleared the way for the likes of Lawrence Summers, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Robert Rubin, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick, Rahm Emanuel, Kent Conrad, Jim Johnson and a host of other Democrat Wall Street insiders to pillage the markets and then design plans to have taxpayer money fund their shananigans.

History makes clear that liberals and, might I add, their RINO accomplices, easily succumb to the drunken stupor of spending everyone else's money. Freedom loving citizens have as their duty taking away the keys of elected office from these ego-centric miscreants. Friends of freedom do not let politicans drive drunk on the spending of OUR MONEY! Take note, TARP and stimulus bill supporters - rooms are being prepared for you at the detoxification center known as a return to private life. WE THE PEOPLE are declaring 2010 as the year of sobering up. Got it? We're coming to take away the bottle.

 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Excuses! 305 Pink Slips To Be Issued On Capitol Hill

We are not buying it! Your lame apologies and excuses will not be accepted. We trusted you with an awesome privilege and you failed, miserably. Don't send us flowers, candy, gifts. How dare you try and serenade us with an ode to stimilus while filling your worthless mouths with all kinds of pork. WE THE PEOPLE are hereby putting all 305 of you arrogant, morally-deficient, condescending gasbags disguised as Senators and Representatives on notice. Your time is up. You've gone too far.

To borrow from a popular maxim: Hell hath no fury like citizens who've been scorned. Let's explain this in words you bloviating, pompous bureaucrats can understand: You work for WE THE PEOPLE. You have no money, no authority, no power, no food on your august political table unless WE THE PEOPLE decide it is meal time, got it? You were elected by citizens not born into royalty. You have no special rights, no immunity, no inheritance, no genealogical pedigree, none. That cup of coffee you drink in your DC office each morning? We pay for that. That meal you eat each day at exclusive cafeterias? We pay for that. That massage you get after your workout at the Senate or House gym? We pay for that. Truth be told, you don't even own the pens that you sign legislation with because we pay for those, too. Oh, and the costs associated with voting all of you sorry excuses for honorable leaders out of office in 2010 and beyond - you got it - we will pay for that, too.

So, 61 pink slips will be issued, the first batch of them next year, to those in the Senate who had the audacity to vote for the pork-filled stimulus bill on February 10, 2009. Now, the names of all who committed this brazen betrayal of the public trust:
 
In the United States Senate:
Inouye (D-HI) - up for reelection in 2010
Reid (D-NV) - up for reelection in 2010
Bayh (D-IN) - up for reelection in 2010
Boxer (D-CA) - up for reelection in 2010
Bennet (D-CO) - replaced Salazar, up for election to a full term in 2010
Burris (D-IL) - replaced Obama, up for election to a full term in 2010
Schumer (D-NY) - up for reelection in 2010
Murray (D-WA) - up for reelection in 2010
Feingold (D-WI) - up for reelection in 2010
Kaufman (D-DE) - replaced Biden, says he will not seek election to a full term
Dorgan (D-ND) - up for reelection in 2010
Dodd (D-CT) - up for reelection in 2010
Leahy (D-VT) - up for reelection in 2010
Milkulski (D-MD) - up for reelection in 2010
Wyden (D-OR) - up for reelection in 2010
Lincoln (D-AR) - up for reelection in 2010
Gilliland (D-NY) - replaced Clinton, up for election to a full term in 2010

View the rest of the list, including the three repulsive Republicans who voted for this pile of excrement here:
 
 
 
In the United States House of Representatives
 
244 pink slips, all in 2010, will be issued to Democrats who rather than doing the job they were elected to do only represent the worst excuses of public servants ever to walk on American soil:
 http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll046.xml#N
 
WE THE PEOPLE are a patient, considerate and understanding group but we've had enough. No more Mr. Nice Guy. So, you'll understand if we don't shed a tear when you numbskulls actually have to start paying your own way in life, when you are weaned, kicking and screaming, from the milk we generously provided you with for far too long.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Twilight Zone? A Tale Of Two Inauguration Days

There are many similarities between the Carter administration and the Obama administration. A souring economy, a majority in both houses of Congress, the worship of diplomacy as the answer to all conflicts, and promotion of government programs for every imaginable purpose, to name a few.
 
What follows here is a comparison of the inaugural speeches. At times it is hard to distinguish Carter's 1977 entry from Obama's 2009 prose. See if you can correctly guess who is speaking in these excerpts:
 
Excerpt 1: "This inauguration ceremony marks a new beginning, a new dedication within our Government, and a new spirit among us all."
 
Excerpt 2: "What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility, a recognition on the part of every American that we have duties to ourselves, our Nation, and the world."
 
---------------------------------------------------------
 
Excerpt 3: "To be true to ourselves, we must be true to others. We will not behave in foreign places so as to violate our rules and standards here at home, for we know that the trust which our Nation earns is essential to our strength."
 
Excerpt 4: "Guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort, even greater cooperation and understanding between nations."
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------
Excerpt #5: "Time and again, these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked ‘til their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions, greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction."
 
Excerpt #6: "We cannot afford to do everything, nor can we afford to lack boldness as we meet the future. So, together, in a spirit of individual sacrifice for the common good, we must simply do our best."
 
---------------------------------------------------------
 And now, the envelope please, ... the answers are #1,3,6 belong to the peanut farmer turned president; #2,4,5 are statements made by the man with the "funny name" as he put it. The nation and the world have changed much since the 1970s. Isn't it strange that liberals have not changed? America is selfish, rogue nations can be tamed if we only sit down and talk with them, it's time for the rich to share with everyone else, and the citizens of the United States aren't smart enough to know what they really need or want.
 
Four years of incompetence by Jimmy Carter led to an inflationary monster consuming everything in its path, a former ally becoming a radical, sworn enemy of the West, and the roots of this current financial crisis by enacting the Community Reinvestment Act.  The question then is what friendly nation will turn venomous as a result of Obama's diplomacy? Also, what behemoth similar to the infamous Departments of Education and Energy will Obama saddle our nation with? Finally, who is it that is waiting in the wings to lead us, in 2012, to that shining city on a hill where, as Reagan believed and proved, citizens are seen as more capable than bureaucrats in spending their money?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forget About Aisle 7 - Clean Up On Pennsylvania Avenue!

Happens every day somewhere in this great land. A parent positions the shopping cart too close to a shelf full of spaghetti sauce filled glass jars. A child reaches out and, you guessed it, havoc ensues on Aisle 7 at the supermarket. The normal course of action is to paige the college kid working there every afternoon, you know, mop and bucket dude - on the double! Unfortunately this is not your ordinary supermarket. You will find no canned veggies, no produce area brimming with bright colors, no frozen foods section. Even though it's the largest supermarket ever built the only item in stock here is pork. Thousands upon thousands of packages, all shapes and sizes, all of it pork!

 
Over 400 employees work in this enterprise. A few of them do their jobs to the best of their abilities, keeping in mind that the owners have trusted them with the place. Today, January 28, 2009, late in the afternoon, 244 workers decided everything in the store belonged to them! Imagine going to the grocery store, being met at the door by an employee who announced a new store policy: All customers must now pay for your purchases at the door, we will take your list of items, debate about the nutritional value of them, and eventually deliver said groceries to your place of residence. Would you continue to shop at that store?
 
 
Now picture this - you are not the customer, you are the owner, and have just been told that as soon as your employees feel like it they will let you into the store! We the people of this more perfect union ARE THE OWNERS of the House of Representatives and were just told to buzz off by individuals who are employed by us, to work for us and not against us. It's time for the memo to go out to all employees. By the way, 244 of you will be called into the manager's office for a review - yes, we need to talk.
 
 
If your name is on the "YEAS" list here:  http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll046.xml#N then you have an appointment with management to discuss your poor peformance. Furthermore, if any employee persists in such insubordination your employment will be terminated.
 
 
Would the head cashier (Speaker of the House, in more professional terms), Ms. Nancy Pelosi begin the process of cleaning out your desk and locker. After your meeting with the owners in 2010 you will no longer be allowed on the premises. 243 additional meetings, with similar outcomes will be conducted in the near future. We the people (the owners) are already taking applications for dependable, responsible individuals to fill your positions.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

American Diplomacy Idol, Take Two, Or Is This Take Three?

Winning on the popular television show "American Idol" takes talent, hard work, personality, and even then one is not guaranteed a successful musical career. The winner must continue improving on their craft, continue working hard, and develop their personal success.  Sadly, politics and diplomacy seem to reward failure rather than success. Jimmy Carter, a.k.a. American Diplomacy Idol is a shining example of a politican who failed miserably during his presidency and yet was rewarded with a Nobel Peace Prize. Three decades later, a new contestant is exciting the crowds and judges in the ongoing competition. President-elect Barack Obama, a.k.a. Diplomacy Idol wannabe is crooning a lovely song for all to hear.
 
If Barack Obama can further destabilize the Middle East, give away areas of the world that are in our national interest, as Carter did with the Panama Canal, plead and beg with rogue nations to hold talks leading to peaceful solutions on subjects such as human rights, wimp out as commander-in-chief when American citizens are taken captive, suggest imposing import limits on foreign oil which will only worsen an energy crisis, go on television and proclaim how bad things are and will only get worse (hasn't Obama already been doing that?), cut defense spending and intelligence readiness in order to show our enemies we mean no harm, therefore they should do the same, then and only then does Barack Obama stand a chance at being the next American Diplomacy Idol.
 
In a Jerusalem Post article on June 20, 2007, Michael D. Evans writes: "The shah was terrified of Carter. He told his personal confidant, 'Who knows what sort of calamity he [Carter] may unleash on the world?'" Evans drives home the havoc left in the wake of Carter's actions during his presidency: "Carter believed then and still does now that evil does not exist; people are basically good; America should embrace the perpetrators and castigate the victims. ... Carter's belief that every crisis can be resolved with diplomacy-and only diplomacy-now permeates the Democratic Party. Unfortunately, Carter is wrong. There are times when evil must be openly confronted and defeated."
 
Now, almost 30 years later, president-elect Barack Obama appears poised and ready to make the same mistakes President Carter made during his administration. As Evans also states, current Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is assuming the role of Ayatollah. Barack Obama is casting himself as Jimmy Carter. The stage is set for yet another president who thinks talking about things will solve problems, change behaviors, and simply by persuasion make friends of our enemies.
 
Unlike the music industry where failure, though painful for a former star, is not catastrophic for the nation or the world, President-elect Barack Obama shows strong tendencies of wanting to win the current version of American Diplomacy Idol even if the nation and the world suffer at his expense.  He, Speaker Pelosi, and Senator Reid seem to delight in things getting worse, and in prolonging a crisis in order to implement more government programs which means more government control over everything, including We The People.
 
There was another contestant in the not too distant past, remember?  The man from Hope who spoke of his own version of hope and change. He and his co-president of a wife deregulated the mortgage industry and banks, strengthened laws to force lenders to make bad loans, endangered our national security, and of course, attempted the biggest power grab in recent times via the Hillary Healthcare debacle. Clinton's post-idol life, so far, has not been as dramatic a failure as Carter's, but can America afford to let Barack Obama try to win the title over these next four years? As citizens in this constiutional republic of ours, we-like viewers of American Idol-have a vote. Unlike viewers of American Idol, we the people must remember that we also are the competition judges. We are listening and we are watching, respectfully, Mr. President-elect, Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Reid and the 2010 judging of your entries will soon be decided.  
 
Okay, everyone join with me in a melodious course of "Let's party like it's 1994, and elect a conservative Republican House and Senate majority once more!"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Obama Speaks! As Yogi Berra Would Say, It's Dejavu All Over Again

Gasoline prices are out of control. The cost of groceries seems to increase every time you push a shopping cart down the aisles. Dire predictions spew from the talking heads on the evening news broadcasts. Elected officials wipe the sweat from their brows as they attempt to craft and approve legislation to help the average citizen. Our adversaries appear to be gaining in strength despite our nation's attempts to preserve freedom for ourselves and our allies. We cannot afford to wait. Government must take drastic measures and do so with haste.
 
If you think the above paragraph is a description of 2009 as President-elect Barack Obama is set to take office, think again.  Every sentence of the opening paragraph describes the nation and the world as we knew it during former President Jimmy Carter's administration. The comparisons between Obama-speak and Carter-speak are striking. However, the reality behind the speeches could not be much more different. For instance, socialism or communism was still a formidable threat in the 1970s. Today, there is no "superpower" communist nation to contend with at every turn. Also, the economy of 2009, while battered and bruised, is far more robust than the high-interest, high inflation doldrums of the 1970s. Furthermore, the 2009 version of OPEC is not your father's version that existed in the 1970s. Have those of us old enough to remember forgotten how bad those times were? Those who are too young to remember please join in this brief recounting of events:
 
** Lines of automobiles that sometimes stretched to several blocks long while waiting for a rationed number of gallons to put in your gas tank. Need a refill? If you waited in line again you could get another rationed amount, IF the supply at the station had not run dry.
 
**A stock market having diffculty recovering from a nearly fifty percent loss in 1973-74. Daily reports of dismal economic news only adding to the despair in financial markets.
 
**The stinging defeat of Vietnam still fresh in the nation's memory. Pacifist, idealistic world views of Carter and Cyrus Vance, the Secretary of State, further diminish military pride and patriotism. Add to that the bumbling efforts to resolve the Iran hostage crisis.
 
**Instead of a motivated, confident leader there is President Carter, begging and pleading for people to conserve energy, curb consumer spending, and apologizing for our nation's excesses. Taking to the airwaves to proclaim a crisis of confidence and offering solutions that would only make things worse if actually implemented.
 
**ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, local newspaper(s), local radio stations that squeezed in a newsbreak at the top of the hour. There was no alternative media, no talk radio, no cable television, no internet access, no personal/home computers.
 
**The results of the 1976 election were: A Democrat president, Senate with 61 Democrats-38 Republicans-1 Independent, House of Representatives with 292 Democrats-143 Republicans.
 
As you can see, in many ways things then were much worse than they are now. Let's move on now to an interesting comparision of campaign promises. Who claimed he was the anti-government candidate, the one who would bring hope and restore people's trust in American idealism? In 1976, Elizabeth Drew stated in American Journal that this strategy was responsible for Carter's election victory. (Source: The American Presidents. Copyright 2000, Salem Press, Inc.) Guessed Obama? You're also correct! Hope, change, transparency in governing, sound familiar?
 
In summary, our nation has been "here" before. Barack Obama's claims of utter and total collapse without immediate trillion dollar government spending is the same old grab for power that liberals have always favored. And, like during the Carter years, those same liberal politicians who were responsible for energy and economic woes proclaimed they had the solutions for fixing them.
 
Conservatives in the 21st century find themselves in a much better situation than our colleagues of the 1970s. Our mission now is to remember what Goldwater, Reagan and Gingrich taught us while developing methods for that message in the internet and multimedia world we now live in.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Do You Spell Corruption? One Letter At A Time

Since many in the mainstream media as well as the majority of our elected officials seem to have a lack of understanding (or a lack of fortitude?) concerning the true causes of the mortgage meltdown, I decided that spelling it out letter by letter may be of assistance. 

F - Frank, Barney - The guy who pledged allegiance to the soundness of agencies he knew were not on solid footing! He should be thoroughly investigated for, among other things, obstruction of justice and conspiracy to commit fraud!

 
A - A.C.O.R.N. - You know, the advocate corruption of regulators and neighborhoods group, a.k.a. friends of Obama. The organization that bullied banks into making bad loans but looks the other way when its own affiliates have 200+ tax liens.
 
N - Nancy Pelosi - Promised an ethical House as speaker but exempted her hubby's businesses from minimum wage increases. She is the quintessential liberal politician.  The lowest Congressional approval ratings ever have resulted from her leadership and yet it is always someone else's fault.
 

N - Negligent - Defined in Webster's Dictionary as "habitually failing to do the required thing." As our employees (yes, everyone one of you in Congress is elected to work for us, rather than against us) where was the oversight, where is the accountability?  Such gall you have in accusing others of the very crimes you have committed as public servants!!
 
I  - Interstate Banking And Branching Efficiency Act of 1994. Banks no longer had to compete locally, now they could branch out from coast to coast, as long as they remained in the good graces of Janet Reno by making subprime loans under the Community Reinvestment Act.
 
E - Earmarks - A world of bringing home the bacon while claiming ignorance about your own favorable treatment (Yes, I'm talking about you Chris Dodd, Kent Conrad, Joe Biden, and several others in the world's most exclusive club.)
 
M - Moses, Herb - Rep Frank's heart throb while Moses was an executive at Fannie Mae. So, Barney was involved in making laws that would/could/did benefit his lover's GSE initiatives. Well, did Frank block efforts at regulating Fannie Mae because he was trying to prevent a scandal at Fannie Mae or an enraged lover's wrath? Thanks Barney for screwing the taxpayers, couldn't you have kept that sort of thing between the two of you?
 
A -  Accounting standards - Enron, MCI, Lehman Brothers, and Citigroup pale in comparison to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Yet, the very elected officials who caused this crisis are grilling others at hearings! If you egotistical brats left a private company is such disarray you "representatives" and Senators would be spending time in the big house - and hopefully, even now justice will be served and so will the guilty parties who committed fraud against the citizens they were elected to represent!
 
E -  Emanuel, Rahm - During a period of time when Freddie Mac was accused of campaign finance violation and accounting irregularities, Rahm was on the board of Freddie Mac and refused efforts to right the ship.
 
=============================================
 
Ken Lay, Bernie Ebbers, other former executives sit in jail while Senators and Representatives who caused this present crisis condescendingly feign anger at those who were only attempting to comply with the very laws Congress had forced on the industry?  We're not done yet! In a future entry we'll learn how to spell FREDDIE MAC.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Collusion Of Mainstream Media A Criminal Offense?

 

I’m not an attorney and I don’t play one on TV. However, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and others appear to have conspired against the public they are licensed to serve or report the news to.

Collusion is defined in Webster’s Dictionary as “a secret or agreement for fraudulent or illegal purpose.” The mainstream media purposely withheld information about Obama before the election. Furthermore, The Communications Act of 1934 specifies that media outlets must serve in the public’s interest - NOT the presidential candidate(s) interests. To put it even more bluntly: Get a clue Chris Matthews!

This is the same mainstream media that shoved story after story down our throats about inappropriate emails from Republican Mark Foley, but earlier this year all three evening news broadcasts failed to make any mention whatsoever about Democrat Tim Mahoney’s sexual misconduct.

This is the same mainstream media that has dropped the ball on who really caused the mortgage scandal/crisis because some Democrats would suffer by being exposed as the money-grubbing, lying crooks and thugs they really are. For crying out loud, in the late 1980s and early 1990s even Democrat attorney Bob Bennett, in his final report on the Keating 5 scandal, indicated he wanted to exonerate the only Republican of the five, John McCain. However, the Democrat-controlled Congress balked at the idea since it would leave only three of their party members (John Glenn was also cleared of wrongdoing) responsible for the S & L scandal.

This is the same mainstream media that refused to cover Monica Lewinski even though they knew about the scandal. All of them spiked the story and made efforts to keep the facts hidden. The Drudge Report did the job the mainstream media neglected-check that-refused to do and brought them kicking and screaming into covering the story.

This is the same mainstream media that ran with false stories about George W. Bush’s National Guard service. Dan Rather and his producer Mary Mapes were exposed as frauds and executive management at CBS News had no choice but to fire them.

Shame on you Charles Gibson, Brian Williams, and Katie Couric, Chris Matthews and other journalistic imposters! Such brazen disregard for your audience and their right to the information you’ve withheld from them should result in ABC, CBS, NBC and other guilty entities being fined, reprimanded or even the networks’ possible loss of license due to malfeasance. As the regulator of the airwaves the Federal Communications Commission has the obligation to mete out punishment when media outlets commit crimes against the viewing public.

The first amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of the press but it does not mean the press has the freedom to subvert information the public should know about a party’s presidential candidate. Plain and simple, we have witnessed journalistic malpractice!  
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialism Explained For Young Voters

 

For anyone under 30 the concept of socialism may be difficult to comprehend.  After all, if an individual was born in 1985 they have no "real world" experience of what life was like when the U.S.S.R. was attempting to terrorize the globe.  Therefore, I decided to explain the effects of socialism using video game parallels.  Originally posted in five parts on Twitter, they are presented here now for your perusal:

Socialism explained for young voters-p1: Like PlayStation? Too bad-government (Obama) says you must play X-box games-or else!

Socialism explained for young voters-p2: Want that new game? Too bad-big brother says you must continue playing the old games!

Socialism explained for young voters-p3: X-box sales (govt revenue) have slowed. The One says you must pay per hour to play-is no longer free!

Socialism explained for young voters-p4: Like playing games late at night? Your govt issued time allowance has been changed by law.

Socialism explained for YV-p5: Since you insist on playing games not approved by govt-Your X-box will be confiscated-by surrender or by force.

We all, no matter our age or propensity for gaming, must understand that in politics one cannot simply hit the restart button when the game is over.  One cannot hit the restart button if you don't like the way the current game is going.  When, not if, Obama and the extreme leftists in Congress take away the perks they promised you during the campaign Obama voters will realize the restart button, like Dorothy's slippers in The Wizard of Oz, do not work as advertised.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anyone Really Surprised About How Bailout Money Is Being Spent?

Shock!  Dismay! Unbelievable!  Really? So the government is not using the 700 billion dollars to buy up toxic mortgages even though they said they would?  This should not come as a surprise. All one has to do is think back to the tobacco settlement.  We were promised it would be used for healthcare and various related issues.  On average, states have spent less than five percent of settlement dispursements on health care issues and expenditures.  The story we were fed by the elite media and liberals in Congress conveniently omitted the fact states were actually free to spend the money on whatever was deemed necessary. Why should we be surprised to find out that the bailout money is going to people and places other than those who were supposedly going to lose their homes and businesses if the federal government did not immediately rescue us?  MrWebsmith thinks that what we really need to be rescued from is the likes of Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter and others who strong-handed mortgage lenders into making bad loans via the Community Reinvestment Act, Interstate Banking Act, and other policies and laws that paved the way for the mess we are now witnessing.
 
Suggested reading:
 
Rep Frank and friend Herb Moses at the epicenter of Fannie Mae's collapse http://tinyurl.com/3jfkfh
 

Govt. to banks: You must make bad loans, or else! http://tinyurl.com/5xqyts
 
In Bill Clinton's book My Life, p.517-18 he brags about CRA and how his administration was able to push through 800bln to Fannie/Freddie
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »